A Holy Mission:
Mission as Social Holiness
by Lieutenant Xander
Coleman
It sometimes seems that when
we start to talk about the things of God, words fail us.
The differences in meaning between technical
theological words break down because the fullest meaning of
each word is wrapped up in the meaning of others.
Often that means that in articulating our belief we
grasp at words like ropes of sand, knowing that they are
inadequate, yet somehow we are able to navigate through them
to get to the heart of who God is and what he is like.
This has been my experience with the word 'mission' for
some time now.
Perhaps this reveals the theological lens through which I
interpret the world, but every time I hear about this aspect
of mission, or this theme of or key to mission, my head
screams out, 'is that not just social holiness?!'
In exploring the links and overlaps between social
holiness and mission, this paper will consider the biblical
idea of shalom as the 'end result' of mission and the
definition of true social holiness.
What
is mission?
David
Bosch, that eminent missiologist, concedes that 'ultimately,
mission remains undefinable'.[1]
That
notwithstanding, he argues that Christianity is inherently
missional,[2]
because God is inherently missional.[3]
God's mission (missio Dei)
is 'God's self-revelation as the One who loves the world,
God's involvement in and with the world, the nature and
activity of God, which embraces both the church and the world,
and in which the church is privileged to participate'.[4]
This definition is almost too
broad to be useful, that mission is anything that God is doing
in the world that the church may or may not be involved with.
The role of the church, as the community of God's
people, in God’s mission is perhaps easier to nail down.
One understanding of the church's mission is 'to give
visible evidence of the kingdom and its ethics within its own
community and in its ministry to the world'[5].
Here, the church exists to make
the kingdom of God known – to establish the reign of God – in
the world and, interestingly, 'within its own community'.
This points to the church not as a static
organisation
but as an organism in the process of becoming.
In that regard, it might be argued, even discipleship
of Christians within the church towards holiness of life is
one aspect of mission.
And so we come to a point where the definition of
mission is so broad that everything is 'mission', and the word
loses its usefulness in communicating.
Chilcote is perhaps a little more helpful in offering
that 'mission, on its most basic level, is nothing more or
less that offering Christ to others through concrete actions'.[6]
There is of course the tension
between evangelistic actions of mission, which seek to
introduce people into a saving relationship with Jesus Christ,
and ministries of justice and compassion, which seek to
alleviate suffering and meet human need in a display and
foretaste of the kingdom.
Bosch warns against separating 'the spiritual or
personal sphere from the material and the social' in missional
activity.[7]
People are whole, and a
whole-person or holistic approach to mission needs to be
taken. Both
aspects of mission arise out of God's love for humanity in
general and individuals in particular, because 'love is the
law of the kingdom of God'.[8]
John 3:16 denotes the source of
mission as God's love for the world through Jesus Christ.
It is this same love injected by the church into the
world through concrete acts which constitutes mission.
The end result of mission:
Shalom
If
missional activity is a signpost to the kingdom of God, then
that kingdom is the end result of mission.
It is very infrequently that missiologists will discuss
what the end result of mission is – what mission hope
ultimately to achieve – and how the church will know when she
gets there. This
may be largely due to differing eschatological perspectives,
and it is beyond the scope of this essay to explore the links
between eschatology and mission.
Nevertheless it maybe helpful to have an image of what
the kingdom of God – for which we work and pray and watch –
looks like. I
argue that the Old Testament picture of shalom is such
an image, illustrating what the kingdom of God is like.
Shalom is translated in most English bibles as
'peace', which is accurate enough, but the Hebrew
understanding of that word goes far deeper than the English
word 'peace' gives it credit for.
Brueggemann argues that shalom embraces ideas of
'love, loyalty, truth, grace, salvation, justice, blessing,
righteousness' and resists 'tendencies to division, hostility,
fear, drivenness, and misery'.[9]
For Brueggemann, 'shalom is
the substance of the biblical vision of one community
embracing all creation,' referring to 'all those resources and
factors which make communal harmony joyous and effective'.[10]
This
beautiful Hebrew word (from a verb “to bring to completeness”,
“to make whole”) speaks of a totally integrated life with
health of body, heart and mind, attuned to nature, open to
others, in joy with God; of sharing, mutuality and love; of
justice, freedom, interdependence, reciprocity.
(Punton, 1975)
Shalom
is, quite literally, life in fullness – the abundant life
which Jesus promises in John 10:10.
Thus, if interpreted messianically, the prophecy in
Isaiah 9 takes on a strong missional flavour: 'Of the increase
of his government (reign) and peace (shalom, fullness)
there will be no end' (Isaiah 9:7, TNIV).
In that short sentence, God's reign and shalom
are inaugurated by Jesus and established in ever-increasing
measure.
Shalom is 'the goal of His
mission'.[11]
As well
as being intrinsically linked to the aim of mission, Chilcote
writes of an 'understanding of social holiness as our
calling to be “servants of
shalom in the
world”'.[12]
In the Old Testament, the aim of
the law was that the holiness of the community of Israel would
lead to the experience of shalom.
Israel was to be different from the nations surrounding
it, exhibiting the reign of YHWH.
The entire thrust of the Old Testament, argues
Christopher Wright, is a message about 'social and economic
justice, about personal and political integrity, about
practical compassion for the needy', and there is no biblical
evidence that this thrust is 'in any sense provisional or
dispensable' under the New Covenant.[13]
Holiness of life under the Old
Covenant led to shalom, but Mike Riddell suggests that
'there is a qualitative change in the concept of holiness from
the Old Testament to the New.'[14]
This seems to come from a
two-dimensional understanding of Old Testament holiness as
ritualistic and removed from relational accountability.
Yet, argues Wright, 'Jesus endorsed the moral
principles of the Old Testament and thereby the
Scripture-based missional priorities of God's people'.[15]
Chilcote argues, 'Jesus' mission
was characterized by healing those who were sick, liberating
those who were oppressed, empowering those who stood on the
margins of life, and caring for the poor.
In all of these he incarnated shalom, God's
vision of peace, justice, and well-being for all'.[16]
Ultimately, shalom speaks
of a community exercising love towards one another.
In commanding his disciples to 'love the Lord your God
with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your
mind' and to 'love your neighbour as yourself' (Matthew 22:37,
39, NRSV) Jesus stipulated the conditions of the reign of God
and imparted how his shalom could be established.
This greatest of commandments - love for God and love
for neighbour – forms the sum and substance of what holiness
is. The social
part of that – love for neighbour – is what is referred to as
social holiness.
Social Holiness
'The
church has for much of its history accepted uncritically the
separatist approach to holiness', accuses Riddell in a
challenge to traditional holiness teaching.[17]
This statement is simply untrue –
it has been the pietist and holiness movements over the last
four centuries that have been at the vanguard of holistic
missional engagement with the poor, as I will demonstrate
below. Riddel is
correct in stating that 'separation and mission are not easily
compatible,'[18]
but his claim that holiness thinking is obsessed with purity
and separateness and therefore detrimental to mission is
inaccurate. He
reduces the rich theology of those movements to this
statement: 'When followers of Christ regard daily life as a
minefield which threatens their purity, it is only to be
suspected that they will be fearful and recalcitrant in their
dealings with “outsiders”'.[19]
Rather than legalistically
pursuing external righteousness and avoiding contamination
from 'sinners', as Riddell portrays holiness to be, holiness
as expressed by John Wesley is described as 'perfect love'.[20]
There has been a great missional
thrust of the holiness movement which was motivated by love
for neighbour.
Though misguided in setting up such a straw-man argument
against traditional holiness teaching, Riddell nevertheless
correctly concludes that 'True holiness will not keep us from
the world, but drive us into it in faith'.[21]
This
engagement rather than separation is what Wesley referred to
as 'social holiness'.
Wesley famously wrote, 'the gospel of Christ known no
religion but social; no holiness but social holiness'.[22]
In context, Wesley was railing
against the separatist brand of 'holiness' that Riddel
lambasted. 'To
Wesley, “Holy solitaries” were no more likely to exist than
holy adulterers'.[23]
Holiness is perfect love, and love
must be expressed in the context of community.
'While the original meaning had to do more with the
importance of accountability groups,' contemporary
interpretations have 'developed to do with ministries of
social justice and works of mercy'.[24]
While personal holiness was an
essential experience for every believer, for Wesley the
purpose of that personal holiness was a social holiness that
would transform the world and ring in God’s reign.
American holiness movement leader Phoebe Palmer
insisted that 'holiness made one a servant',[25]
and there is a clear link in holiness teaching between
holiness and mission.
In the current Salvation Army Song Book, under the
heading, 'The life of holiness' is found the subsection
'Consecration and service'.[26]
These two ideas – dedicating one’s
life to God unto holiness and serving him as an agent of
mission in his world – are inseparable in the sung theology of
a holiness movement that has consistently sought to deliver
holistic mission throughout its history.
The chorus of a classic Salvationist prays,
For
thy mission make me holy,
For
thy glory make me thine,
Sanctify each moment fully,
Fill
my life with love divine.
(SASB
463)[27]
Here,
God's mission is empowered by a holiness that endows the
seeker with divine love for the world.
'Contrary to the stereotype' perpetuated by the likes
of Riddell, 'the joy of the holiness life often spilled over
into social ministry'.[28]
Indeed, the experience of
'sanctification by faith freed enormous energies for the
service of others'.[29]
Social
Holiness and the Holiness Movement
This
'understanding of social holiness' as a 'calling to be
“servants of shalom in the world”'[30]
was amply demonstrated in the holiness revivals of the
nineteenth century.
An example of this holistic approach to mission is
Phoebe Palmer, a holiness pioneer who sought to bring renewed
emphasis to the doctrine of sanctification in American
Methodism. Palmer
'merged the personal piety of a second work of grace...with an
active approach to social action'.[31]
If a person need not wait for
heaven to experience Christian perfection, she reasoned, why
should society need to wait?
Could shalom, like entire sanctification, not be
experienced here and now?
'As holiness missionaries saw individual lives
transformed, they believed social transformation was a
distinct possibility.'[32]
Bringing about the sanctification
– perfection of love – of both individuals and society became
the driving force for holistic mission for Palmer's disciples.
Palmer opened a mission house in the Five Points
district of New York City, which was a 'frightening warren of
brothels, low-grade dives, decayed tenements, street gangs'.[33]
It was not enough to parachute in
from the middle-class suburbs: holiness missioners sought to
express God's love by engaging incarnationally with the
community. 'The
mission house at Five Points incarnated God's love by allowing
workers to live among the poor and by giving the poor a place
to live as they took their first step out of poverty'.[34]
From the Five Points mission food
was distributed to the starving, clothing to the cold and
naked, medical supplies to those who could not afford them.[35]
It also provided employment and
transitional accommodation for up to 500 poor women and their
children.[36]
Kostlevy posits that 'the Five
Points work became the model for later Protestant
institutional missions in American cities,'[37]
and continues to influence how inner-city mission is done
around the world.
The growth of similar holiness missions in urban centres
across North America was such that Drury can assert, 'social
action was as much a part of the American holiness movement as
was personal holiness'.[38]
As late as 1924, a homelessness
study in San Francisco discovered that almost all services to
the homeless that city 'were being provided by
holiness-inspired urban ministries, such as the Peniel
Mission, the Volunteers of America, and the Salvation Army'.[39]
Drawing the parallels
Far from
separating themselves from society, the holiness movement
engaged the world in which they existed to challenge its evils
and to love it with the love of God.
'Social holiness, in this sense, therefore, has
everything to do with mission'.[40]
In seeking to bring about the
perfection of society according to the divine law of love,
holiness missioners demonstrated the kingdom of God and
displayed a movement towards shalom.
'There is great missional and evangelistic power,'
observes Wright, 'in lives shaped by the standards of biblical
holiness and goodness'.[41]
Indeed, the Assemblies of God
Brussels Statement goes further by claiming that holiness of
life itself demonstrates the kingdom and is thus mission:
The
transforming impact of this reconciliation on all dimensions
of the lives of those who are part of God's redeemed community
provides an observable signpost to the reign of God... and is
a powerful witness to the world of the redemptive mission of
God.[42]
Personal holiness, even apart from social holiness (absurd
though that concept is) is missional in that the beauty of
holiness is provocative, according to the Brussels Statement.
Ultimately, in talking about mission and shalom and
social holiness we get down to semantics.
But semantics are important in conveying attitudes and
values and in communicating using helpful language.
What the liberal Christian refers to as holistic
mission demonstrating and establishing the reign of God, the
Old Testament scholar or Messianic Jew would describe as
ushering in YHWH's kingdom of shalom, and the Christian
in the holiness tradition would speak of as perfect love in
action bringing about corporate, social holiness.
The Salvation Army comes undeniably out of the holiness
tradition and for many Salvationists describing mission in
terms of agitating for social and societal holiness would be
helpful to engage them in a theologically familiar way.
Certainly, as a holiness movement we must ensure that
we maintain our tradition of a holiness that is not
separatist, but engages with the world.
'True holiness will not keep us from the world, but
drive us into it in faith'.[43]
As
God enables us to express perfect love for our brothers and
sisters through missional holiness, we will see the
shalom of God
hinted at, signposted, revealed and established in our midst.
The holiness that we are called to is one that will
quite literally win the world for Jesus.
Bibliography
2007
New Revised Standard Version Bible Anglicized
Edition. London, HarperCollins
2005
The Holy Bible, Today's New International Version.
Grand Rapids: Zondervan
Assemblies of God Brussels Statement (AOGBS)
1999
'Pentecostal Mission and Social Concern'.
In Mission
as Transformation.
1999. Eds.
Vinay Samuel & Chris Sugden. Oxford:
Regnum Books.
112-117
Bosch, David J.
1992
Transforming Mission.
Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books
Brueggemann, Walter
1990
Living Toward a Vision.
New York: United Church Press
Chilcote, Paul W.
2011
Servants of Shalom in the World.
[Online]. 2011.
Available from:
http://www.gbod.org/site/apps/nlnet/content.aspx?c=nhLRJ2PMKsG&b=6519811&ct=3171011.
[Accessed 03/06/11]
Drury, Keith
2010
'There is no holiness but social Holiness'.
[Online].
31st August 2010. Available from:
http://www.drurywriting.com/keith/no%20holiness%20but%20social%20Holiness.htm
[Accessed 16/05/2011]
2008
The Holiness Movement's Heritage of Social Action.
[Online].
August 2008.
Available from:
http://www.drurywriting.com/keith/holiness.movement.social.action.htm
[Accessed 03/06/2011]
Eli, R. George,
1993
Social Holiness Defined.
[Online].
1993. Available
from:
http://www.cscoweb.org/sochol.html.
[Accessed 03/06/2011]
Green, Roger
2010
Why Social Holiness?.
[Online].
2010. Available
from:
http://e-summit.org/conference/Why-Social-Holiness.html.
[Accessed 03/06/2011]
Kostlevy, William
2004
'Saving Souls & Bodies'.
Christian History & Biography 82 (2004):
28-31
Maddox, Randy L.
2001
'Be Ye Perfect?'. Christian History 69 (2001):
32-34
Oden, Tom
2001
'Weeds in the Garden'.
Christian History 69 (2001): 43-45
Punton, Jim
1975
The Community of
Shalom: God’s Radical Alternative.
[Online]. 1975.
Available from:
http://johndavies.org/jimpunton-shalom.pdf.
[Accessed 08/06/2011]
Riddell, Michael
1998
Threshold of the Future.
London: SPCK
Salvation Army, The
1986
The Song Book of The Salvation Army.
London: The Salvation Army
White, Charles Edward
2004
'Holiness Fire-Starter'.
Christian History & Biography 82 (2004): 16-
21
Wright, Christopher J. H.
2006
The Mission of God.
Downer's Grove, Illinois: IVP Academic
[5]
Assemblies of God Brussels Statement (AOGBS),
1999: 115
[9]
Brueggemann, 1990: 16
[12]
Chilcote, 2011 (emphasis
mine)
[26]
The Song Book of The
Salvation Army, 1986
[27]
Brindley Boon, The Song
Book of The Salvation Army, 1986
[33]
Paul Boyer, cited in
White, 2004: 20
|