|
Mission: Top Priority for
the Church?
by
Cadet Tim Watson,
Melbourne, Australia
How does mission affect the way Salvation Army Corps function?
I see mission as the continuation
of Jesus’ ministry by Jesus’ followers. Jesus announced the
arrival of God’s Kingdom both by his words and his
compassionate deeds. True Christian mission is also holistic,
bringing together evangelism and acts of service. God’s
mission should be the highest priority of God’s church. The
word mission comes from the Latin missio, ‘to send’. Mission
can certainly be seen throughout the Bible as God reveals his
heart for mission. However, defining Christian mission takes
time because the word mission doesn’t appear anywhere in the
Bible. Michael Raiter explains that the two words meaning ‘to
send’ in the New Testament are pempein and apostellein. Raiter
asserts that these words “refer to the ministry of verbal
proclamation of the gospel to the end that mature churches are
planted and established.”
I disagree with
this view that mission is limited to the ‘verbal proclamation
of the gospel’. I believe our understanding of mission should
be a holistic one that includes both word and deed. Samuel
Escobar points out that the mission of Jesus and the first
church were certainly holistic. The Grand Rapids Report of the
Lausanne movement states, “As good news of love in Christ, the
gospel demands both to be preached and to be lived.”[2}
Catherine Booth reminds us that
our mission to share the gospel is of utmost importance:
Are there not teeming thousands
round about you who never heard His name, and who care nothing
for Him, who live every day trampling His law under their
feet? For Christ's sake, send somebody after them.[3]
Mission should
be the “dominant and controlling passion of the Church”[4]
declares Commissioner Phil Needham. “The Church exists
primarily for the sake of its mission in the world.”[5]
If this is true then corps need to intentionally focus on
mission. All resources and every aspect of a Corps’ life
should contribute to mission. Mission-driven Corps will invest
considerable time and money in serving and saving the people
of their community instead of just meeting the needs of people
within the Corps.[6]
General William Booth defined a Salvation Army corps as “a
Band of people united together to attack and Christianize an
entire town or neighbourhood.”[7]
Since God still calls Salvationists (and all Christians) to
mission, this should remain the priority of every corps.
However the Army is now more insular and passive. Instead of
being seen as the leader of a fighting force, General John
Larsson notes that the corps officer is increasingly regarded
as the shepherd of the sheep.
The one
whose task it is to keep the sheep happy, to make them lie
down in pastures green and lead them the quiet waters by. This
picture of the church is unscriptural, un-Army and impossible
if growth is the aim.[8]
Corps that are
intentional about mission train their soldiers and converts
and mobilize them into mission. Small groups or mission teams
are a useful way of doing this. One advantage of small groups
is their adaptability. Small groups can take part in
evangelism or service tasks that address the needs of a
specific part of the community and use the gifts or interests
of group members. Participants in such groups can also keep
each other accountable and active in mission. I believe the
most inspiring and effective training for mission is ‘hands
on’ training where people observe and take part in mission.[9]
Corps that make
mission a top priority will be willing to change in order to
better engage with their community and meet their needs.
Commissioner Needham writes, “An inflexible and immobile
Church is no Church at all; it is a religious relic.”[10]
Sadly The Salvation Army (at least in the western world)
appears more like a cultural artefact than a world-changing
force.[11]
In our fast changing
society we need to rediscover the adaptability that
characterised the early Army. As our
co-founder Catherine Booth wrote, “Adapt your measures
to your circumstances and to the necessities of the times in
which you live.”[12]
In the last four years a creative
mission of The Salvation Army has developed in Reservoir.
Reservoir is a northern suburb of Melbourne which is a lower
socio-economic area identified as having high needs. Known as
Shop 16, its activities include homework groups, social work
in local schools, discipleship groups and weekly worship.[13]
Craig Campbell observes that;
Shop 16 has sought consistently
to be responsive in the neighbourhoods, rather than imposing
pre-formulated solutions based on imported perceptions of
local concerns.[14]
Shop 16 has developed programs to
address needs identified by the local community instead of
importing programs from a different environment. Shop 16 staff
describe their mission as, “to create a belonging community
that focuses on transforming lives through Jesus Christ.”[15]
These
Salvationists certainly embrace incarnational mission as they
share their life and faith while serving and journeying with
the children and families of Reservoir.
When
corps practice incarnational
mission they are following the example of Jesus by taking the
good news to the people. The preaching and compassionate acts
of Jesus extended far beyond the synagogues. Jesus ministered
to people in the streets, at the lakeside, on hillsides, and
at raucous parties.[16]
In my experience the aim of most corps is to attract people to
programs at the corps building, especially Sunday meetings.[17]
Yet I believe this attractional attitude ought to be replaced
with more incarnational approaches. Catherine Booth pointed
out that intentionally engaging with the unchurched is
essential to effective mission:
Christianity
must come to them embodied in men and women, who are not
ashamed to “eat with publicans and sinners”; they must see it
looking through their eyes, and speaking in loving accents
through their tongues, sympathising with their sorrows,
bearing their burdens…[18]
The early
Salvation Army “passionately believed in, and practiced,
incarnational mission.”[19]
Salvationists related to the poor and working class on their
level. They went to the people, lived amongst them, spoke
their language, sang their tunes and met their needs. Needham
explains the Army has preserved its distinctive culture yet
lost this incarnational approach.
As we began
to substitute the celebration and preservation of our
Salvationist culture for our engagement with people in the
streets, we became less a mission and more a club… Even our
social services became more building oriented: ‘You come to
us, meet our conditions and we’ll help you. We don’t do the
streets anymore.[20]
The integration
of evangelism and social action is vital to the Salvationist
concept of mission. In Boundless Salvation John Cleary
points out that for the early Salvation Army, salvation from
poverty (Temporal Salvation) and spiritual transformation were
both “critical to the full expression of the gospel.”[21]
Cleary argues that the Army needs to recover this integrated,
comprehensive understanding of mission. William Booth said The
Salvation Army is like a bird:
With one
wing it preaches the gospel of Jesus Christ. With the other
wing it meets human needs in his name without discrimination.
He said unless both wings are in operation, The Salvation Army
bird will not fly.[22]
“Social work
and corps work seem to be moving apart at a frightening rate,”
notes Craig Campbell, “with social program growing rapidly”
while corps are declining in size.[23]
Over the past decade The Australia Southern Territory has
increased its social services by 300%! Yet the Territory’s
number of Senior Soldier and corps attendance fell by 14% & 7%
respectively between 1996 and 2001.[24]
Tom Sine makes
some suggestions that I feel are very relevant for The
Salvation Army. Tom Sine warns the church has become apathetic
towards people in need “outside its doors.”[25]
Sine suggests the church re-examine its “reliance on
large-scale institutional or professional solutions to human
needs.”[26]
For years
many of us have been able to get away with paying others -
Pastors, social workers, urban youth workers - to do our
caring for us.[27]
Sine calls for
the church to move its focus from institutional social
services towards incarnational ministry through “a revolution
of lay activism in the compassionate mission of Christ in the
world”.[28]
Sine challenges lay Christians to “become integral members of
communities of need – as an incarnational witness.”[29]
Have we
Salvationists ‘outsourced’ our mission of caring for people to
large numbers of – mostly non-Christian – employees? General
Shaw Clifton argued that in future, all Salvation Army
employees working directly with the public should be saved.
“If you are not saved, how can you properly function as a
partner in mission from within an evangelical Christian
denomination?”[30]
Servants Together asserts that Christian mission
requires more than charitable giving.
We must put
our hearts and souls into it, feeding the hunger of
individuals for fellowship and compassion as well as meeting
their physical needs.[31]
In summary,
Christian mission is sharing the good news of Jesus through
words and deeds. Just as God sent Jesus, all followers of
Jesus are sent to live out God’s mission in our world. Corps
must to make mission their top priority if they are to be
faithful to God and the reason God raised up The Salvation
Army. Mission centred corps adapt their methods to suit their
situation. Mission controlled corps should move from
attractional to more incarnational approaches. Mission
focussed corps take an integrated approach to mission. Corps
could learn from the approach of Shop 16, which is a great
example of innovative, incarnational and integrated
Salvationist Mission.
Bibliography
Booth, C.,
Aggressive Christianity, The Salvation Army IHQ, London,
1891
Booth,
Catherine, Practical Religion, The Salvation Army IHQ,
London, 1890
Booth, William,
Salvation Soldiery, The Salvation Army Triumph Press,
Oakville, Canada, 1980 (First published 1889).
Booth,
William, “What Shall We Do?” in Journal of Aggressive
Christianity, Issue 5, February-March 2000 (1st published
in
The War Cry, 6/1/1900).
Campbell,
Craig, Emerging Images of
Salvationist
Mission: “For the Glory of God and the Benefit
of Your Generation.”
Melbourne College of Divinity Thesis, 2004
Camsey,
Terry, Slightly Off Centre! Growth Principles to Thaw
Frozen Paradigms, Crest Books, Alexandria, Virginia,
2000
Cleary,
John, Boundless Salvation: An
Historical Perspective on the Theology of Salvationist
Mission,
(6th
Draft) Unpublished Document, 2001
Clifton,
Shaw, Who are these Salvationists? Crest Books,
Alexandria, 1999
Escobar,
Samuel, A Time for
Mission,
Inter-Varsity Press, Leicester, 2003
Gibson, R.J.
(Gen. Ed.), Ripe for Harvest: Christian Mission in the New
Testament and in our World, Openbook Publishers, Adelaide,
1998
Gnanakan, Ken,
Kingdom Concerns, Inter-Varsity Press, Leicester, 1993
Larsson,
John, How Your Corps Can Grow: The Salvation Army and
Church Growth, The Salvation Army International
Headquarters, London, 1988
Larsson, John,
“The State of the International Salvation Army’ speech at IHQ,
20/5/05,
http://www1.salvationarmy.org/ihq/www_sa.nsf/vw-dynamic-arrays/A89BD861C7B941AD802570120047ED0F?openDocument
Morgan,
Gregory, “Great Aunt Sally?” in The Officer,
March/April 2005
National Church
Life Survey, NCLS Occasional Paper 3: 2001 Church Attendance
Estimates, 2004,
www.ncls.org.au
Needham,
Philip, Community in
Mission: A
Salvationist Ecclesiology,
Salvation Army Supplies,
Atlanta, 1987
Needham,
Philip, “Membership” in Journal of Aggressive Christianity,
Issue 35, (February-March 2005)
www.armybarmy.org
Raiter,
Michael, ‘‘Sent for this Purpose’: ‘Mission’ & ‘Missiology’ &
their Search for Meaning’ in Ripe for Harvest, ed. R.J.
Gibson, Openbook, Adelaide, 1998
Sine, Tom,
The Mustard Seed Conspiracy, Word Books, Waco, 1981
Stott, John,
The Contemporary Christian, Inter-Varsity Press,
Leicester, 1992
The Salvation
Army, Annual Report for the year ending 2003/2004, The
Salvation Army Australia Southern Territory, Mont Albert, 2005
The Salvation
Army, Servants Together, The Salvation Army IHQ,
London, 2002
The Salvation
Army, Year Book, The Salvation Army IHQ, London, 1999,
2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004
|