JAC Online

Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry - A Thoughtful Proposal
by Captain Rob Reardon

 

In this paper, I offer thoughts on the sacraments from a Salvation Army point of view that could help foster Church Unity.

 

INTRODUCTION

In 1982, the World Council of Churches released Faith and Order Paper No. 111, entitled, “Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry.” In the preface of this document, it is stated that “important for the development of this text has been the witness of local churches which have already gone through the process of uniting across confessional division. It is important to acknowledge that the search for local church union and the search for universal consensus are intimately linked.”[1] Later in the preface the dilemma of church unity is addressed as it relates to justice, peace and reconciliation in the world: “As the churches grow into unity, they are asking how their understandings and practices of baptism, Eucharist and ministry relate to their mission in and for the renewal of human community as they seek to promote justice, peace and reconciliation. Therefore our understanding of these cannot be divorced from the redemptive and liberating mission of Christ through the churches in the modern world.”[2]

Remaining in the preface, additional comments are made regarding the need for consensus in the areas of baptism, Eucharist and ministry so that true unity can be achieved through the Holy Spirit. Arrival at such consensus can only be fulfilled through deep conviction and humility. Such hope is given breath when past contentions are addressed: “In leaving behind the hostilities of the past, the churches have begun to discover many promising convergences in their shared convictions and perspectives. These convergences give assurance that despite much diversity in theological expression the churches have much in common in their understanding of the faith.”[3]

Subsequent to the publication of “Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry,” The Salvation Army, at the invitation of the World Council of Churches for an official response from the highest levels of ecclesiastical authority, prepared a text that was released in 1985 and later published in booklet form in 1990, entitled, “One Faith, One Church: The Salvation Army’s Response to Baptism, Eucharist & Ministry.” In this publication, the Army’s non-observation of traditional sacraments is succinctly presented, aiming to “emphasize the Army’s unity in Christ and Christian faith with all who accept him as Savior and Lord while humbly but confidently presenting its theological position as a valid alternative to that emphasized in the Lima Text.”[4]

While I am an active Salvation Army officer and have been dedicated to the Army’s mission and remain committed to The Salvation Army’s doctrinal and theological positions, this paper is my own personal response to the World Council of Churches’ “BEM” document. My aim is to offer a thoughtful proposal as a point of discussion in the ecumenical dialogue, using my understanding of Scripture alongside a Salvationist perspective on the sacramental traditions. The format of this paper will be similar to that of the “BEM” document, following each of the three headings in order and as each relates to the other.

BAPTISM

In the fifteenth chapter of Acts the account is given of certain people and Pharisees teaching that circumcision was necessary for salvation (15:1, 5). In this situation, Gentiles were being saved and the Jewish believers were convinced that salvation wasn’t possible for Gentiles unless circumcision was performed in order to keep the Law of Moses. Paul and Barnabas arrived in Jerusalem to look into the situation and come to a consensus for the sake of unity among the believers of both Jewish and Gentile origin. Scripture records that much discussion and debate took place which was followed by Paul’s address to the assembly: “My brothers, you know that in the early days God made a choice among you, that I should be the one through whom the Gentiles would hear the message of the good news and become believers. And God, who knows the human heart, testified to them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as he did to us; and in cleansing their hearts by faith he has made no distinction between them and us. Now therefore why are you putting God to the test by placing on the neck of the disciples a yoke that neither our ancestors nor we have been able to bear? On the contrary, we believe that we will be saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, just as they will” (15:7b-11). Paul concluded: “Therefore I have reached the decision that we should not trouble those Gentiles who are turning to God, but we should write to them to abstain only from things polluted by idols and from fornication and from whatever has been strangled and from blood” (15:19-20).

To further emphasize this newfound unity, Paul would declare to the believers in Ephesus that there was an expectation of unity among those who were once hostile towards one another:

“So then, remember that at one time you Gentiles by birth, called “the uncircumcision” by those who are called “the circumcision”—a physical circumcision made in the flesh by human hands— remember that you were at that time without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world. But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. For he is our peace; in his flesh he has made both groups into one and has broken down the dividing wall, that is, the hostility between us. He has abolished the law with its commandments and ordinances, that he might create in himself one new humanity in place of the two, thus making peace, and might reconcile both groups to God in one body through the cross, thus putting to death that hostility through it. So he came and proclaimed peace to you who were far off and peace to those who were near; for through him both of us have access in one Spirit to the Father. So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are citizens with the saints and also members of the household of God, built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the cornerstone. In him the whole structure is joined together and grows into a holy temple in the Lord; in whom you also are built together spiritually into a dwelling place for God” (Eph. 2:11-22).

During the earliest days of the church, a ritual that had been instituted by God through Moses was set aside for the sake of unity within the Body. This wasn’t a decision that was made lightly. Scripture records that Paul and Barnabas embarked on a lengthy journey to arrive in Jerusalem to investigate the matter that was causing division. Along their journey, they heard of the many Gentile conversions. Upon their arrival in Jerusalem, we are told that much debate ensued. We are handcuffed by the lack of narrative surrounding this debate, but we can only presume that considerable time and energy were expended for such a weighty subject. Thousands of years of tradition and practice were at stake. Paul, who had been counted among the chief of Pharisees, knowing full well the ramifications of the law, was poised to make the decision to set aside the practice that caused division – for the sake of unity in the Body, even a sacred act of covenant was deemed non-essential.

Since that momentous occasion, the Body once again finds itself divided sharply. Particular to the practice of baptism, consensus is being attempted, yet we continue to fall short. Could it be that in the 21st Century, as in the 1st, it is time to look at a human tradition that has been sanctified by the church as non-essential for the sake of unity within the Body? Within the universal body of the Church, there are numerous manners in which baptism is practiced. Some practice infant baptism, while others only baptize adult believers; some faith traditions sprinkle with water, while others practice full immersion. Commentary (6) in the BEM document admits to continued division: “The inability of the churches mutually to recognize their various practices of baptism as sharing in the one baptism, and their actual dividedness in spite of mutual baptismal recognition, have given dramatic visibility to the broken witness of the church.”[5] Within the BEM document, baptism is defined as “the sign of new life through Jesus Christ.”[6] The text continues by stating: “The New Testament scriptures and the liturgy of the Church unfold the meaning of baptism in various stages which express the riches of Christ and the gifts of his salvation. These images are sometimes linked with the symbolic uses of water in the Old Testament.”[7]

It must be noted that “historically water baptism was a common initiation feature in both Jewish and pagan religions.”[8] When John saw Jesus approaching the river in the third chapter of Matthew, John would have been practicing a common ritual to his upbringing as a Jew. Furthermore, Jesus’ insistence that he be baptized by John was in fulfillment of Jewish practice. We know from John 4:2 that Jesus himself did not baptize anyone. As noted in the passage above from Ephesians, Jesus came to remove the barriers that had been erected by man; he came to bring peace where there had been hostility. John’s prophecy concerning Jesus tells of the intent of Christ’s baptism: “The one who is more powerful than I is coming after me; I am not worthy to stoop down and untie the thong of his sandals. 8I have baptized you with water; but he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit” (Mark 1:8). Thus, the baptism of the Holy Spirit is what is important and nowhere in scripture is it clear that baptism by water equates baptism of the Holy Spirit. On the contrary, we can see that the Apostles at Pentecost were filled with the Holy Spirit without the precursor of any physical act (Acts 1:4; 2:1). Once filled with the Holy Spirit, the Apostles were able to proclaim the Gospel in languages heretofore unknown to them. It is precisely this baptism therefore, that enables all believers to participate in Christ’s Great Commission: “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything that I have commanded you” (Matt. 28:19-20).

EUCHARIST

As a point of clarification, classic definitions of the terms sacrament and ordinance are necessary: Sacrament: God’s activity, eliciting our response; Ordinance: Human activity born out of our obedience.[9] The Salvation Army is of the view that Holy Communion is considered to be an Ordinance. We would not hold to the belief that there is a spiritual or mystical power in the act itself. “A sacrament is something that has an inherent sanctifying effect, that is, the ceremony itself is sacred and has the power to make you sacred.”[10]

It is best to articulate The Salvation Army’s position concerning the Eucharist, with the intention of elaborating on the proposal begun in the previous section. Together they form an overall praxis for ministry that is born out of a deeper, non-practicing form of sacramental living as displayed through active ministry.

Admittedly, The Salvation Army’s early rationale for not practicing the Eucharist was practical; it was a well known fact that the Army’s founder, William Booth was nothing if he was not pragmatic. Therefore there were four practical reasons[11] for our non-practice:

1.            Use of wine was universal for communion. This was unthinkable for the Army with its large number of recovering alcoholic members.

2.            Confusion existed over who may legitimately preside over the sacraments. The Army has consistently applied the principle of the priesthood of all believers and promotes egalitarian ministry. This, of course, would include women.

3.            Confusion existed over who would receive the sacraments. Order would be necessary, especially considering the rowdy crowds attending those early Army meetings. Would everyone be indiscriminately offered communion? Who, then, would decide which persons received and which did not? That question would very likely lead to unnecessary conflict over a practice that was intended to promote reconciliation.

4.            The sacraments have been misused in a superstitious way. Members of churches with a strong sacramental emphasis have often grossly misunderstood their church’s position.

Going deeper theologically The Salvation Army believes firmly that we are a “part of the prophetic tradition, which from Old Testament times has declared against all comers that ceremonial religion is not the only, or even the best, way to God.”[12] It is not denied among Salvationists that “remembrance of the crucified and risen Christ is central to Christian worship.”[13] But rather than contain such a remembrance in a solitary act, the Salvationist would contend that such remembrance was necessary and ought to be exhibited throughout the entirety of the believer’s life. When he was General of The Salvation Army, Albert Orsborn wrote of the sacramental life[14]:

My life must be Christ’s broken bread,

My love his outpoured wine,

A cup o’erfilled, a table spread

Beneath his name and sign,

That other souls, refreshed and fed,

May share his life through mine.

My all is in the Master’s hands

For him to bless and break;

Beyond the brook his winepress stands

And thence my way I take,

Resolved the whole of love’s demands

To give, for his dear sake.

Lord, let me share that grace of thine

Wherewith thou didst sustain

The burden of the fruitful vine,

The gift of buried grain.

Who dies with thee, O Word divine,

Shall rise and live again.

The notion of an entire life dedicated to sacramental living is paramount to Salvation Army theology: “Every Salvationist is committed to this sacramental service. It was for this purpose that the movement was formed. The call to sanctification involves a call to sacramental living.”[15] With the inclusion of sanctification leading to holiness, a deeper theological understanding begins to take shape. It is the belief of The Salvation Army that holy living is sacramental living. As Orsborn’s lyrics indicate, the believer’s life as Christ’s broken bread and love as his outpoured wine, is meant to be proactive in seeking to bring others to a closer communion to Christ himself. Moving away from the more private and personal act of partaking in Holy Communion, the sacramental lifestyle at once engages others in the practice. Retired Salvation Army Commissioner Phil Needham writes: “There can be no sacraments divorced from everyday life; there can only be the sacramental potential of each moment of everyday life. In keeping with its Wesleyan heritage, The Salvation Army has traditionally used the word ‘holiness’ to describe the sacramental life, and ‘sanctification’ as the gracious act of God which makes holiness possible. The sacramental life is lived in the power of the Spirit.”[16]

A recent suggestion for the Army’s position contends that it is neither anti-sacramental nor non-sacramental, but instead neo-sacramental (new expression of).[17] Indeed, as I’ve moved from a state of naiveté to a deeper, more mature understanding of my denomination’s position on the subject of Sacramental Theology, I can say beyond a doubt that I hold to our view on the subject. On my best days I endeavor to live in such a way to embody the mandate set forth in living so that my life lived is truly Christ living in and through me. In doing so, I cling to the concept of sacramental living in a way that brings others closer to Christ through my participation daily and consistently in the death and resurrection of Christ – thereby actively remembering…doing this…as commanded by Christ.

MINISTRY

Insofar as this paper is focused mainly on a proposal concerning the place of the traditional sacraments in respect to unity in the Church, it must be noted that in the third section of the BEM document concerning ministry, there are several statements with which I personally resonate as does The Salvation Army as a whole. Allow me to highlight those statements in which there is full agreement: “Through Christ, people are enabled to turn in praise to God and in service to their neighbors.”[18] Most assuredly, it is our belief that once a soul has been reclaimed by Jesus Christ, it is an inevitable response on behalf of the individual to turn their heart simultaneously toward God and fellow human-beings. “The church is called to proclaim and prefigure the Kingdom of God…In order to fulfill this mission faithfully, they will seek relevant forms of witness and service in each situation. In doing so they bring to the world a foretaste of the joy and glory of God’s Kingdom.”[19] The Salvation Army has, from its inception, had the priority of Kingdom business at the forefront of our mission on earth. The Army’s mission statement was succinctly summed up by retired General John Gowans in 2000: “The Salvation Army was created to Save Souls, Grow Saints and Serve Suffering Humanity.”[20]

Salvation Army officers are ordained ministers of the Gospel and adhere to the principles of ordination that govern most, if not all Christian expressions of church. There is little disagreement with the text of the BEM on this subject. “Experience in The Salvation Army confirms that ‘Christ continues through the Holy Spirit to choose and call persons to the ordained ministry,’ and the inner assurance of that call and the seal of the Holy Spirit have sustained thousands of Salvation Army officers in [123] lands through a life-time of active and fruitful ministry. The Salvation Army officer has unquestionable right to, and theological support for, his divinely granted and sustained authority – to claim, like the apostle Paul, to be ‘a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, set apart for the gospel of God’ (Romans 1:1). The terms used in the Lima Text serve to confirm this belief.[21]

Briefly, to bring this section to an end, The Salvation Army affirms the position based on Galatians 3:28 – “There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female; for all of you are one in Christ Jesus.” We whole-heartedly believe that women are not only eligible for full-time ministry, but are gifted by God to be leaders and visionaries in the universal Church.

CONCLUSION

I don’t believe it to be a coincidence that Paul’s words referenced above from Galatians 3:28 – “…for all of you are one in Christ Jesus” echo the words of our Lord when he prayed for his followers in John 17:20-23, “I ask not only on behalf of these, but also on behalf of those who will believe in me through their word, that they may all be one. As you, Father, are in me and I am in you, may they also be in us, so that the world may believe that you have sent me. The glory that you have given me I have given them, so that they may be one, as we are one, I in them and you in me, that they may become completely one, so that the world may know that you have sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me.”

Therefore, my proposal as presented is one that would see baptism removed as a barrier to true unity and those traditions to whom the sacramental lifestyle takes precedent over practicing the Eucharist be considered for  full acceptance. A phrase often attributed to St. Augustine says: “In necessariis unitas, in dubiis libertas, in omnibus caritas,” or translated, “unity in necessary things; liberty in doubtful things; charity in all things.” I believe that The Salvation Army has something of value to add to the ecumenical dialogue in these areas presented. We are a missional movement, compelled to minister to humanity through the grace and love given us by God through the sacrifice of God’s son, Jesus and the infilling of the Holy Spirit. “We maintain that there is a need for the continuing witness to the freedom of God to bless his people even outside the traditional sacramental means of grace. We are encouraged by the comment of Professor John Macquarrie (Principles of Christian Theology, page 376): ‘Although The Salvation Army has no sacraments, we could not for a moment deny that it receives and transmits divine grace.”[22]

While we respect the long held traditions of the church, we recognize that in the 21st Century, there remain barriers to those that would believe in the risen Christ. To reach out and offer to them the life-giving gift of salvation without human conditions, I believe is what God is calling the church to do. God offers unconditional love to the repentant soul, but all too often God’s human agents attach conditions that prevent the work of salvation.

In Matthew chapter nineteen, we read of the young man who came to Jesus seeking the key to eternal life. After the brief conversation, Jesus told him he was lacking one thing – that he was to sell all his possessions and give the proceeds to the poor, then he was to come and follow Jesus. Shocked and saddened, the young man walked away. Jesus commented to his disciples, that it was hard for the rich to enter the Kingdom of God. Perhaps our tightly held possessions are keeping the church from realizing true unity. Perhaps Jesus is asking us to leave that which we hold dear to follow him in saving the world, but we are not able to let go. Jesus ended this encounter by making the declaration: “For mortals it is impossible, but for God all things are possible” (Matthew 19:26).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

 

Faith and Order Paper #111 – Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry. Geneva: World Council of Churches, 1982

One Faith, One Church: The Salvation Army’s response to Baptism, Eucharist & Ministry. London: The Salvation Army, 1982

The Salvation Army Handbook of Doctrine. London: The Salvation Army, 1969

Songbook of The Salvation Army. Verona, NJ: The Salvation Army, 1987

Clifton, Shaw. Who Are These Salvationists? Alexandria, VA: Crest Books, 1999

Garrington, Jim. Equipped for Battle Chicago, IL: The Salvation Army, 2002

Needham, Philip. Mission in Community: A Salvationist Ecclesiology Atlanta, GA: The Salvation Army, 1987

Rightmire, R. David. Sacraments and The Salvation Army: Pneumatological Foundations London: The Scarecrow Press, 1990

Class notes – PW101 Introduction to Corporate Worship, Wesley Theological Seminary, Spring 2010

 



[1] BEM, vi

[2] ibid., vi

[3] ibid., vii

[4] One Faith, One Church: The Salvation Army’s response to Baptism, Eucharist & Ministry (London: The Salvation Army, 1982), 5

[5] BEM, pg 2, D. 6 (6)

[6] Ibid., pg 1, II.2

[7] Ibid.

[8] One Faith, One Church: The Salvation Army’s response to Baptism, Eucharist & Ministry (London: The Salvation Army, 1982), 11

[9] Class notes – PW101 Introduction to Corporate Worship, Spring 2010, Wesley Theological Seminary

[10] Jim Garrington, Equipped for Battle (Chicago, IL: The Salvation Army, 2002), 177

[11] Ibid., 178-179

[12] Shaw Clifton, Who Are These Salvationists? (Alexandria, VA: Crest Books, 1999), 59

[13] One Faith, One Church: The Salvation Army’s response to Baptism, Eucharist & Ministry (London: The Salvation Army, 1982), 28

[14] The Songbook of The Salvation Army (Verona, NJ: The Salvation Army, 1987), 142

[15] The Salvation Army Handbook of Doctrine (London: The Salvation Army, 1969), 180

[16] Philip Needham, Mission in Community: A Salvationist Ecclesiology (Atlanta, GA: The Salvation Army, 1987), 18-19

[17] unknown

[18] BEM, pg 16, I.2

[19] Ibid., pg 16, I.4

[20] The actual mission statement reads: The Salvation Army, an international movement, is an evangelical part of the universal Christian church. Its message is based on the Bible. Its ministry is motivated by the love of God. Its mission is to preach the gospel of Jesus Christ and to meet human needs in His name without discrimination.”

[21] Faith, One Church: The Salvation Army’s response to Baptism, Eucharist & Ministry (London: The Salvation Army, 1982), 43-44

[22] Ibid., 65

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

   

 

your shopping is guaranteed safe using SSL

eStore account - Sign Up Now! Contact Us - General. Technical Support. Sales Jesus is amazing!  If you see this image tag you should know that He is THE way... not a way!  Grace!
Home Terms of Use Privacy Policy Sitemap Contact Us
copyright ARMYBARMY
armybarmy